The Market for Physician-Researchers’ Labor: Unpaid Work, Paid Access
Arthur Lazarus, MD, MBA, CPE, DFAAPL
July 10, 2026
Physician Leadership Journal
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 34-36
Abstract
Academic publishing is foundational to advancing medical knowledge, shaping professional identity, and promoting academic advancement. Yet the contemporary publishing model increasingly relies on uncompensated labor by physician-researchers, while imposing financial and access barriers to the dissemination of that same work. This article examines the structural features of academic publishing that normalize unpaid authorship and peer review, shift costs to investigators through article processing charges, and restrict access to clinically relevant research. It also considers the growing role of artificial intelligence in peer review as a predictable response to systemic strain. Finally, the author proposes institutional, editorial, and professional actions to support ethical, sustainable, and mission-aligned approaches to scholarly publishing in medicine.
Topics
Economics
Healthcare Process
Resource Allocation
Related
The Collaboration Imperative: Why Healthcare Executives Must Unite Against an Existential ThreatFollow the Money: A Health Plan Insider’s Guide to Payer–Provider ContractingThe CEO of UnitedHealthcare on Fixing What Frustrates Customers MostRecommended Reading
Finance
The Collaboration Imperative: Why Healthcare Executives Must Unite Against an Existential Threat
Quality and Risk
Reducing Clinical Variation Through Interdisciplinary Leadership: A Field Report from a Large Academic Medical Center
Quality and Risk
3 Medical Routines That Older People May Not Need
Quality and Risk
In Your Medical Practice, Is Your “Nice” Quotient Too High?

